Student Athletes or just Athletes?
The practicality of integrating sports into a college campus
has been questioned for decades. This has included branching out questions of
many kinds. Should student athletes be paid for their contributions to the
university? Should there even be college athletics in the first place? Do
college athletics draw away from the educational aspect of college? These
questions and several others are going to be the center of the next five blog
posts. Sports are at the heart of nearly every university. Perhaps if students
are able to grasp the complexity of some of the issues surrounding college
athletics, then this can lead to better and more well-rounded campuses across the
nation.
In order to dive into the depths of this conversation, the
most important part is understanding what a student athlete is and what the
meaning behind a student athlete attempts to accomplish. The term student
athlete implies exactly what it says. Athletes who have been chosen to play at
a collegiate level are students first and athletes second. In other words,
education should be the primary focus of each individual. However, this is
simply not the case. The student athlete system has failed most collegiate
athletes.
Image compliments of the Odyssey Online
A survey in 2011 conducted by the NCAA found that a large
majority of athletes identified themselves as athletes first and students
second. Most admitted to spending up to double the amount of time they have on
their athletic training compared to their educational studies. This was found
to be the case even in the off-season. In fact, during the off-season, athletes
were sometimes less likely to perform well academically because all they needed
was to be eligible during the season. This is simply not the mentality intended
to be placed in so called “student athletes.”
Furthermore, athletes are picking their schools based on
what team they want to play for, not what educational system fits them best.
Often, athletes are recruited solely based on their athletic ability. At times
they may not even meet the educational requirements for a particular
university. In instances like this exceptions are made and athletes are given
admittance.
Perhaps the worst part about the student athlete hoax is
that most student athletes don’t even pick their own major. They are placed
into a very low level major. One that would be difficult not to succeed in. So,
universities and the NCAA may be throwing around numbers with high graduation
rates for athletes, but how much is their degree really worth. The majors they
are placed in and the amount of work placed in their academic careers does not
set them up for success in a life outside of sports. Their degrees are intended
to be a fall back or back-up plan to their professional careers. However, in
today’s modern world the degrees they receive may not even be that.
Image compliments of the Daily Emerald
Additionally, a large percentage of student athletes don’t receive
a degree. For basketball, only one year of college enrollment is required to
proceed on to the professional level. Previously, no college was required at
all. Stars like LeBron James and Kobe Bryant never attended college. They went
immediately into a professional career. Comparatively, in football athletes
must be at least three years removed from high school. This is a better system
but still reveals the problem that at very young ages, of perhaps 19 or 20
years old, student athletes are making life altering decisions with absolutely
no fall back plan even if it may be a meager one.
Overall, the student athlete system is seeming to fail in
today’s society. Academics have often become obsolete for these various
individuals. The media and other outside influences have pushed athletes to only
focus on their athletic careers so that they can make the “big bucks” as soon
as they can. Perhaps the solution lies in giving athletes monetary compensation
for their efforts. Perhaps the solution lies in getting reducing the importance
of collegiate sports all together. Whatever the case may be it is clear that
the value of education needs to be instilled in college athletes. Otherwise,
the majority of them will end up forgotten and jobless.
I have always thought that the strong emphasis put on organized sports this day and age was sort of, distracting. At what point did we start caring more about sports than education? I think it's so sad that some are willing to overlook one person's entire academic history just for the good of the sports program, and meticulously judge another's.
ReplyDeleteI have always thought that the strong emphasis put on organized sports this day and age was sort of, distracting. At what point did we start caring more about sports than education? I think it's so sad that some are willing to overlook one person's entire academic history just for the good of the sports program, and meticulously judge another's.
ReplyDeleteFor my Senior Research Project in high school I addressed the question of whether or not college athletes should be paid, so this post was obviously pretty captivating for me. I think you mentioned some really important flaws in the system. In particular, I think something should be done about basketball players spending one year and college and going straight to the NBA...that just seems so wrong. Education is completely removed from that situation, even for the one year they're actually on a campus.
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, I love the set up of your blog with the NCAA logos in the background. I also thought it was interesting to point out that many players skip around the admissions process simply because of their athletic talent. How is this beneficial to the university when their main focus should theoretically be on academic improvements. Does this leave a negative impact on the rest of the students, or is the university able to balance the needs of both academic and athletic programs?
ReplyDeleteAfter having this topic brought up as a possible deliberation topic, I realized that I really had no knowledge of the student-athlete situation. This was a great post explaining the issue, and I look forward to reading your other posts!
ReplyDeleteAfter having this topic brought up as a possible deliberation topic, I realized that I really had no knowledge of the student-athlete situation. This was a great post explaining the issue, and I look forward to reading your other posts!
ReplyDeleteGreat post! I really appreciated how you keyed in on the fact that the vast majority of student athletes don't go on to professional careers in their sport, so education obviously matters most.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your assertion that the current collegiate system has failed college athletes. I know plenty of times of barely eligible players coasting through classes. I've also seen firsthand great athletes and mediocre students get offers from Ivy-League schools and struggling academically upon matriculation. I'm curious to see what you arrive at when it comes to potential compensation for these players.
ReplyDeleteYour post was a very interesting read, there are many aspects to student athletics which I have never considered. This is going to be an important blog to watch going into the deliberations unit.
ReplyDeleteThis is an issue that I believe needs to be taken into account by many universities in America. I am curious to see where this blog goes. I do have to agree with the notion that one-and-done college basketball careers tend to not lead to a high success rate at the pro level with many playing over seas. The 'no-fallback-plan' needs to be addressed. On Senior day here at Penn State for our football team, many players were Kinesiology majors. I think it is great that they are graduating with some sort of degree, but I don't know how many of them can truly get a well paying job in the work force after sacrificing themselves and their bodies the way they did.
ReplyDelete